Profit, Pollution, and Power: Exposing the Corporate-Government Conspiracy that Has Betrayed America

BAYER CROP SCIENCE

The American public deserves to know the Truth about the powerful alliances between Bayer Crop Science, officials within the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). These alliances are not mere conflicts of interest; they form a carefully orchestrated conspiracy to undermine public health, pollute the environment, and erode national sovereignty—all in pursuit of corporate profits and personal enrichment. Bayer’s influence within these agencies has allowed it to evade accountability, sell toxic products, and even manipulate environmental conditions, while key officials have amassed millions in personal wealth.

From the toxic contamination at the BKK Landfill to the financial collapse associated with the Washington Mutual Bankruptcy, this conspiracy has caused widespread harm. The individuals involved have become millionaires on the backs of the American people, prioritizing their own fortunes over the well-being of those they were sworn to protect. It’s time to examine the overwhelming evidence of this alliance and demand accountability.

---

The Bayer Crop Science Agenda: Manipulation, Environmental Harm, and Corporate Control

Bayer Crop Science is not just an agricultural corporation—it is a behemoth with the power to manipulate the environment, influence government policies, and maintain monopolistic control over essential resources. Through its acquisition of Monsanto, Bayer inherited control over toxic herbicides and genetically modified organisms (GMOs), along with Monsanto's extensive history of environmental abuse. But Bayer’s agenda goes beyond traditional corporate profiteering; it has invested in technology and political influence to manipulate weather patterns, control food supplies, and prioritize its profits over global public health and safety.

Evidence of Bayer's Wrongdoing and Environmental Manipulation:

1. Weather Manipulation through Cloud Seeding
   Bayer Crop Science has invested heavily in cloud seeding technology, a method of weather manipulation that disperses chemicals into the atmosphere to stimulate or inhibit rainfall. Although promoted as a solution for water management, cloud seeding can be weaponized to control agricultural conditions, disrupt local ecosystems, and influence crop yields. Bayer’s control over weather-modifying technology allows it to dictate agricultural cycles, further embedding dependency on its seeds, pesticides, and proprietary farming solutions.

   • 18 U.S.C. § 1365 - Tampering with Consumer Products: By tampering with natural resources and manipulating environmental conditions, Bayer’s actions constitute consumer product tampering on a massive scale. Their technology disrupts ecosystems and impacts human health, raising concerns of environmental tampering.

2. Promotion of Toxic Herbicides like Roundup
   Bayer’s glyphosate-based herbicide Roundup has been conclusively linked to cancer, particularly Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma, and other serious health conditions. Bayer, however, continues to aggressively market Roundup, often downplaying the risks. Despite lawsuits, public outcry, and scientific evidence, Bayer has avoided meaningful accountability, thanks in part to its influence within regulatory bodies like the EPA and FDA.

   • 18 U.S.C. § 1341 - Mail Fraud and § 1343 - Wire Fraud: Bayer’s ongoing misrepresentation of Roundup’s safety constitutes fraud. By promoting Roundup through misleading marketing tactics and using electronic communications to deceive the public, Bayer has committed wire fraud and mail fraud, putting the health of millions at risk.

3. Genetically Modified Crops and Dependency-Based Agriculture
   Through Monsanto’s GM seed patents, Bayer controls a significant portion of the seed market. These genetically modified seeds are designed to be resistant to Bayer’s herbicides, creating a closed system that forces farmers to buy both the seeds and the chemical inputs from Bayer. This dependency-based agriculture erodes food sovereignty, making farmers around the world reliant on Bayer’s products and destroying traditional, organic farming methods.

   • 15 U.S.C. § 2 - Sherman Antitrust Act: Bayer’s monopolistic control over the seed market and the creation of dependency-based agriculture constitutes a violation of antitrust laws. By limiting competition and enforcing dependency, Bayer is working to eliminate independent farming and promote a monopolistic model of food production.

---

Regulatory Capture and Corruption at the EPA and FDA

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA), tasked with safeguarding public health and the environment, have instead become instruments for corporate profiteering. High-ranking officials within these agencies have prioritized Bayer’s interests, facilitating lenient regulations and covering up health risks associated with Bayer’s products. The revolving door between the FDA, EPA, and Bayer Crop Science has compromised regulatory integrity, turning these agencies into corporate tools—and these officials have personally profited handsomely.

Key Players and Evidence of Wealth Accumulation through Corporate Collusion:

1. Jessica M. Gillian and Thomas L. Reid (EPA)
   Jessica M. Gillian and Thomas L. Reid transitioned from regulatory roles within the EPA to high-paying roles at Bayer Crop Science. As Senior Administrators at the EPA, they advocated for minimal restrictions on Bayer’s glyphosate-based products, allowing harmful herbicides like Roundup to remain on the market despite growing evidence of health risks.

   • 18 U.S.C. § 208 - Acts Affecting a Personal Financial Interest: By using their regulatory positions to benefit Bayer while anticipating lucrative post-government jobs, these officials violated federal statutes that prohibit conflicts of interest.

   • Financial Gain: After leaving the EPA, Gillian and Reid joined Bayer’s leadership team, earning compensation packages that included salaries upwards of $400,000 annually and stock options. Gillian’s net worth is estimated to exceed $5 million, while Reid’s net worth is approximately $8 million, most of it accrued through Bayer-related income.

2. Amanda K. Sloan and Brian R. Anderson (FDA)
   Former FDA officials Amanda K. Sloan and Brian R. Anderson transitioned to high-paying roles at Bayer Crop Science after shaping FDA policies to favor the company’s interests. Sloan played a key role in expediting the approval of glyphosate products, while Anderson supported regulatory decisions favorable to GM seeds.

   • 18 U.S.C. § 201 - Bribery of Public Officials and Witnesses: Their acceptance of Bayer roles with six-figure salaries and substantial stock options represents a quid pro quo arrangement, where favorable regulatory treatment was exchanged for financial gain.

   • Financial Gain: Sloan, currently a Bayer board member, earns over $450,000 annually, along with stock options. Her net worth is estimated to exceed $7 million. Anderson’s net worth is approximately $9 million, with a significant portion derived from his advisory role at Bayer and associated stock incentives.

---

The BKK Landfill: A Toxic Legacy of Corporate Negligence

The BKK Landfill in California stands as a stark example of the environmental degradation that Bayer and Monsanto have wrought. Toxic chemicals from Monsanto’s operations were dumped at the landfill, polluting groundwater and posing severe health risks to nearby communities. Bayer’s acquisition of Monsanto also brought responsibility for this environmental disaster, but the company has shirked its obligations, leaving local communities to deal with the toxic fallout.

• 42 U.S.C. § 9607 - Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA): Under CERCLA, companies that contribute to hazardous waste sites are responsible for cleanup costs. Bayer’s evasion of its responsibilities at the BKK Landfill violates this statute, further exemplifying the corporation’s prioritization of profit over environmental responsibility.

The BKK Landfill exemplifies the long-term consequences of regulatory capture, corporate greed, and environmental negligence. The health impacts on nearby communities—ranging from respiratory issues to elevated cancer rates—are direct consequences of Bayer’s actions and the EPA’s failure to enforce environmental protections.

---

The Washington Mutual Bankruptcy: Financial Destabilization and Corporate Consolidation

The Washington Mutual Bankruptcy was the largest bank failure in U.S. history, triggering a chain reaction that destabilized the American financial system. This financial collapse, though not directly connected to Bayer, is part of a broader conspiracy involving elite networks, regulatory capture, and the undermining of American sovereignty. The economic destabilization created by Washington Mutual’s collapse set the stage for corporate giants like Bayer to consolidate their power, benefiting from a weakened regulatory environment and the erosion of public accountability.

• Economic Exploitation and the Consolidation of Power: The Washington Mutual Bankruptcy benefited corporate elites who have used financial crises as opportunities to consolidate control. Bayer’s influence over food supplies, environmental resources, and regulatory agencies fits into this larger pattern of corporate consolidation and control. The same networks that facilitated Washington Mutual’s collapse have enabled corporations like Bayer to gain monopolistic power over critical resources.

This conspiracy, which connects economic exploitation with environmental and health policy manipulation, represents an attack on the foundations of American democracy. Bayer’s unchecked power and the complicity of government officials create a system where public welfare is sacrificed for the benefit of a powerful few.

---

Conclusion: A Call for Immediate Action and Accountability

The American people have been betrayed by an alliance between Bayer Crop Science, the EPA, the FDA, and powerful corporate interests. This conspiracy has manipulated environmental conditions, exploited public health, and destabilized our economy—all in the pursuit of profit and personal enrichment. The evidence is undeniable, and it is time for decisive action.

This post calls for the immediate suspension of all government dealings with Bayer Crop Science, an investigation into the financial relationships between Bayer and former EPA and FDA officials, and a thorough public accounting of the harm caused by these actions. Only through transparency, accountability, and reform can we restore the integrity of our regulatory systems and protect the American people from corporate exploitation.

Subscribe for Updates:
Stay informed about the collusion between Big Pharma, government agencies, and corporate giants. Subscribe for more investigative posts as we continue exposing the Truth and fighting for accountability.

---

References

1. World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). “IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Glyphosate.” Classification of glyphosate as a probable carcinogen.

2. EPA Superfund Report on BKK Landfill. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Accessed through FOIA and EPA’s Superfund database.

3. Financial Disclosures of EPA and FDA Officials. Accessible through FOIA requests and public financial disclosure statements filed with government agencies.

4. Congressional Report on Regulatory Capture in U.S. Health and Environmental Agencies. U.S. House of Representatives and Senate hearings on conflicts of interest and regulatory capture at the EPA and FDA.

5. Investigative Journalism Sources:

   • The Guardian. “How Big Pharma Exploited the Pandemic to Make Record Profits.”

   • ProPublica. “EPA and FDA Officials Join Big Pharma After Public Service.”

6. SEC Filings of Bayer Crop Science and Related Companies. Accessed via the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) database.

7. Congressional Hearings on the Washington Mutual Bankruptcy and Financial Crisis. Publicly available records on the impact of financial deregulation and regulatory capture in the 2008 economic crisis.